Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Forum rules
- Comments must be civil and on topic
- Back up claims with evidence/reasoning/sources (posting links is allowed)
- No commercials/harassment/spam
Post Reply
biopearl123
Posts: 2591
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:13 pm

Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Post by biopearl123 »

F.

Either Dawn did not submit my questions to the board or they chose to completely ignore them. Am not sure why they would promulgate the charade of soliciting questions from shareholders.
mistergern
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:48 pm

Re: Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Post by mistergern »

BP, Has the new regime responded to you at any point over the past year?
biopearl123
Posts: 2591
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:13 pm

Re: Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Post by biopearl123 »

Only once when I alerted Dawn to some technical difficulties they were having during a webcast. Even the courtesy of “we can’t discuss that at this point” would have been welcome. In any case the Stifel (from earlier today) presentation was far more forthright than the so called shareholders meeting.
seedylemon
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 8:57 pm

Re: Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Post by seedylemon »

BP:
Individual shareholders are minions, peons, vermin, lab rats, and it was ever thus.
biopearl123
Posts: 2591
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:13 pm

Re: Grade for "shareholders" meeting

Post by biopearl123 »

Mistergern, a more complete answer to your question is this:

“ Vayakam melech chadash al-Mitzrayim asher lo yada et Yosef (or any other shareholder).

I will say my question list was off the top of my head as I tried to think of topics that this board might find pertinent. I will admit my expectations for the outcome were higher.

On the other hand, the Stifel conference had some real nice tidbits worthy of some discussion. More later.
Post Reply