Recent update to Mayo Study

Forum rules
- Comments must be civil and on topic
- Back up claims with evidence/reasoning/sources (posting links is allowed)
- No commercials/harassment/spam
Post Reply
biopearl
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:12 am

Recent update to Mayo Study

Post by biopearl » Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:55 pm

Fellow board members, please check out my comments on SA and let me know if you read anything into the CT site update on the Dr. T study. bp

Build0277
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: Recent update to Mayo Study

Post by Build0277 » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:43 am

BP,
I couldn't find your post on Seeking Alpha's website, so my reaction to the June 16, 2017 Mayo Clinic Study ClinicalTrials.gov website update doesn't reflect your insight(s).

The Mayo Clinic study indicates that it is now scheduled to complete on January 16, 2019. The following outline within the quotation marks is copied and pasted from that update:

----------------------------------------------------
"OUTLINE: Patients receive imetelstat sodium intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on day 1. Patients may continue to receive imetelstat study treatment for as long as they derive clinical benefit or until study end. The study will end when all patients have discontinued study drug, the last patient enrolled has been treated for 5 years, or imetelstat is commercially available in the United States, whichever occurs first."
---------------------------------------------------


The 2nd and 3rd sentences are to me somewhat ambiguous. The study continuation would seem to indicate that patients are continuing to derive OS benefit from Imetelstat, and thus the study end is extended to allow their continued dosing. This is very good news, and it confirms Irish's information regarding her husband's continued benefit. I hope that the January 16, 2019 study end is meant to coincide with commercial availability of the drug.

Fishermangents
Site Admin
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 3:39 pm

Re: Recent update to Mayo Study

Post by Fishermangents » Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:47 pm

Bio, thanks for kicking this off here. I agree with your observations. The Mayo Pilot hasn't been designed for getting approval, unlike IMbark and IMerge. My take is that extending the study-end therefor is not directly related with the approval process and has more to do with studying long term effects (maybe other hem-indications) and probably also with patients still receiving benefits.

Post Reply