Page 1 of 1
Clinical trials site update
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:38 pm
by biopearl
Clinical trials site for MDS study has been updated. Looks like that study will start to reenroll. Watching for MF CT site update for some guidance. bp
Re: Clinical trials site update
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:08 pm
by Fishermangents
Looks like preparation for Phase 3.
Re: Clinical trials site update
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:11 pm
by Fishermangents
Interesting post:
Repost from YMB
Sdrawkcabeman
Although Imerge's P3 was always designed as a double-blind, yesterday's update now indicates: "masked role: participant, investigator." It's either a detail they're just now getting around to updating, or they're putting a polish on it in prep for the P3; considering the timing, I think it too much a coincidence to be merely a perfunctory update. The significance is that a double-blind, placebo trial is de rigueur for pivotals. If the P3 is pivotal, then we can expect a speedy approval b/c they've been enrolling continuously, and b/c the prim/sec measures are short term, ie: transfusion independence of 8 weeks, albeit over the 2 yr duration. However, if the P3 is anything like the pilot and P2, time to response is relatively short, and they can hasten the NDA by opting for a rolling submission.
It could be that MDS will be approved first, w/an Imbark reboot for pts unexposed to JAK inhibitors, concurrent w/an AML trial. Consider how fortunate we are that a single drug, Imet, has three(and likely more) shots at approval, and very good shots, at that; it's a great boon to Imet that these heme malignancies are related. If it had been a one-off indication, the outcome of a single trial, like Imbark, would put a much harder edge on the outcome. The much-anticipated AML trial could conceivably be a very expansive P2 w/multiple combo agents. I think it likely that the trial design should, for efficiency and expediency, explore multiple combos. It'd have to be a much larger trial, w/several hundred pts; enrolling them into one overarching, coordinated trial would be more advantageous than running multiple independent trials.