I thought this was interesting:

Forum rules
- Comments must be civil and on topic
- Back up claims with evidence/reasoning/sources (posting links is allowed)
- No commercials/harassment/spam
Post Reply

Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:00 pm

Re: I thought this was interesting:

Post by rccola335 » Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:56 am

I am expecting the long haul and will consider anything earlier a pleasant surprise - reading that obviously MA is on the table

Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:32 pm

Re: I thought this was interesting:

Post by ashah » Mon Jul 20, 2020 7:23 am

For those of us, who are not as savy in reading the detailed document or ... for those who want a "cliff notes"/summary version of the interesting element ... What is/may be the working hypothesis?
Clearly, given that this forum is not an official board of the company...no need to worry about the safe harbor statements or other legal liabilities :D

Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:13 pm

Re: I thought this was interesting:

Post by biopearl123 » Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:29 pm

Hi Ashah, I think the jist of where I saw this going (perhaps because of an over active imagination) was that an application for Market Authorization in the EU has some mechanism to proceed in parallel to that of Orphan status. It does not appear that they necessarily have to occur in series. In a perfect world we might see movement on both. Best Regards, bp

Post Reply