An end run...
Forum rules
- Comments must be civil and on topic
- Back up claims with evidence/reasoning/sources (posting links is allowed)
- No commercials/harassment/spam
- Comments must be civil and on topic
- Back up claims with evidence/reasoning/sources (posting links is allowed)
- No commercials/harassment/spam
An end run...
The extended time frames are disappointing. But the idea of a sit down with the FDA and trying an end run around needing a dual trial for MF given the current stats, is a novel idea worth pursuing. Kudos for the crew that came up with it
-
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:13 pm
Re: An end run...
Currently traveling. Will post later re conf call and abstracts. Am struck by the inclusion of a significant p value and a real attempt to establish statistical validly in MF study. Many including myself have suggested Scarlett will avoid a PIII in MF. Using matched controls even though historic, is an effort to do so. bp
Re: An end run...
I agree, this is somewhat encouraging. They probably don't have useful historical controls right now because of the differences between different hospitals' protocols and generally bad databases (HIPAA didn't help the already-backwards hospital medical databases).
But that doesn't that the necessary data doesn't exist, if they hunt it down.
But that doesn't that the necessary data doesn't exist, if they hunt it down.