ImetelChat

Does anyone know WHEN we who are affected will get some money out of this litigation? Welcome to the website for the Geron Securities Litigation. HEARING IS SCHEDULED IN FRONT OF THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP. THE HEARING WILL BE HELD AT 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 IN COURTROOM ...

Key PDUFA and regulatory catalysts for the next 6 months This week marks the continuation of our six-month monitoring period, where we expect to see more than 500 significant catalysts. Importantly, 61 of these are currently in the regulatory phase, pending decisions from the FDA. In today’s update,...

The designation of Dr. was originally first assigned only to 'PHD's. Much later.MD, DVD, etc. jumped on the bandwagon. I find all PHD's I know, and I know several hundred of them, do not like to be called Mr. It's either Dr. or their first name.

I have to wonder about a company that calls a PH.D., Mr. Smith. Not too aware there folks.

https://hmpeducation.com/content/access-webcast-303
Imetelstat discussion runs 27:18-33:13

I think it's pretty rare to see a stock price go up when there is a stock offering. Kind of amazing and seems to speak volumes about confidence in Geron.

Excellent points, Biopearl!

Trading now at $3.35. Nice start!

Gern trading now after hours up nice

Yes!!!!!!!!! Great win for patients, doctors and investors!

I find the pro Geron presenters to be very knowledgeable and impressive. The FDA presenter had bad body language and gave off vibes of dishonesty and anxiety over being dishonest. IMO

I like that there are MDS patients on the panel. I believe there are two. Also MM patient. Very large number of people on the panel.

Excellent response from Geron. Feeling confident again. Thanks, Biopearl!

So I bought back most of my previous position now at a lower price than I sold. White knuckle time continues.

Thank you for jumping in, Hoosier! Strange that ODAC posts the negative but not the refuting study.

That seems to be what I recall from Geron spokespersons. They claimed sideffects were easily ameliorated by simple treatment procedure.

What does everyone think about the comments. They strike me as negative, but I have never reviewed adcom comments and agendas before. Does someone have experience/expertise in this area? The comments scared me into selling 2/3's of my holdings.

I am concerned about all the negativity and questioning manner of the comments in the ODAC agenda. Is this just boiler plate stuff or does it point to rejection or need for further study?

Great post! My read is that there are a lot of negative comments about proof of efficacy.

Moderator: Please do something about kmall personally attacking me and anyone who dares question his authority.